Antville.org user administration: strange links at one user #146

New issue

Open

opened 2015-04-04 16:14:14 +00:00 by GoogleCodeExporter · 6 comments

GoogleCodeExporter commented

2015-04-04 16:14:14 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

According to the user administration, "littion" (blocked for spamming) should 
have four comments. However, the links (to them?) are invalid.  

I just want to let you know, in case this might hint at something.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by kinomu.w...@gmail.com on 30 May 2011 at 12:56

``` According to the user administration, "littion" (blocked for spamming) should have four comments. However, the links (to them?) are invalid. I just want to let you know, in case this might hint at something. ``` Original issue reported on code.google.com by `kinomu.w...@gmail.com` on 30 May 2011 at 12:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented

2015-04-04 16:14:15 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

As I already explained replying to your message on the admin’s list (didn’t 
you receive it?): they must have been posted when there was that strange effect 
of stories not becoming attached to their corresponding sites, ie. the site_id 
was not written to the database. As the user_id obviously was, you still can 
see the links in the administration view.

One day we could do a database cleanup by detecting and removing such 
inconsistencies. Thus, I do not close the issue but move it to the φ milestone.

Original comment by interf...@p3k.org on 30 May 2011 at 1:19

Changed state: WontFix
Added labels: Milestone-Release-φ

``` As I already explained replying to your message on the admin’s list (didn’t you receive it?): they must have been posted when there was that strange effect of stories not becoming attached to their corresponding sites, ie. the site_id was not written to the database. As the user_id obviously was, you still can see the links in the administration view. One day we could do a database cleanup by detecting and removing such inconsistencies. Thus, I do not close the issue but move it to the φ milestone. ``` Original comment by `interf...@p3k.org` on 30 May 2011 at 1:19 - Changed state: **WontFix** - Added labels: **Milestone-Release-φ**

GoogleCodeExporter commented

2015-04-04 16:14:15 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Oop, the WontFix was by accident.

Original comment by interf...@p3k.org on 30 May 2011 at 1:19

Changed state: Accepted

``` Oop, the WontFix was by accident. ``` Original comment by `interf...@p3k.org` on 30 May 2011 at 1:19 - Changed state: **Accepted**

GoogleCodeExporter commented

2015-04-04 16:14:15 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Original comment by interf...@p3k.org on 30 May 2011 at 1:23

Added labels: Milestone-Release-Phi
Removed labels: Milestone-Release-φ

Original comment by `interf...@p3k.org` on 30 May 2011 at 1:23 - Added labels: **Milestone-Release-Phi** - Removed labels: **Milestone-Release-φ**

GoogleCodeExporter commented

2015-04-04 16:14:15 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Original comment by m...@tobischaefer.com on 28 Jul 2013 at 8:50

Added labels: Milestone-Release-1.5
Removed labels: Milestone-Release-Phi

Original comment by `m...@tobischaefer.com` on 28 Jul 2013 at 8:50 - Added labels: **Milestone-Release-1.5** - Removed labels: **Milestone-Release-Phi**

GoogleCodeExporter commented

2015-04-04 16:14:15 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Original comment by m...@tobischaefer.com on 7 Mar 2015 at 5:59

Original comment by `m...@tobischaefer.com` on 7 Mar 2015 at 5:59

github-actions[bot] commented

2021-05-17 02:38:22 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Stale issue message